So about Roseanne’s Nuts…

I approached Roseanne’s Nuts with a bit of trepidation.  Roseanne Barr is a hilarious and crucial comic whose self-titled 90’s sitcom spanned nine seasons and remains fresh and fantastic today.  It was, and is, one of the greatest sitcoms of all time.  After its controversy-filled run drew to a close, Barr slipped out of the spotlight.  She briefly hosted a late-90s talk show (of which I was a fan), and re-emerged in 2003 with a pair of projects: Domestic Goddess, a cooking show for ABC Family, and The Real Roseanne for ABC.  The latter was a reality show about the making of the former. I thought that sounded great, the cooking focus and meta-aspect indicated a self-aware docu-series experiment rather than the last-ditch barrel-scraping one might fear.  Roseanne became regular tabloid fodder very early in her fame, a disappointing amount of her press focused on her personal life and trials rather than her excellent and groundbreaking work.  I didn’t want to see her try to cash in on her tabloid queen crown with a degrading reality show, a sadly plausible prospect.  This plan looked like it had potential, so I was disappointed when The Real Roseanne was cancelled after only two episodes.  Domestic Goddessnever aired at all.

It was almost a decade later that I’d readabout Roseanne’s choice to undergo a semi-elective hysterectomy in order to get out of her contract and end both shows.  She says that the producers were shaping The Real Roseanne into an unflattering freak-fest behind her back, cutting her family into unflattering caricatures. She claims her son found a producers notebook:“It said, Jake, ‘lazy,’ my son-in-law Jeff, ‘stupid,’ Roseanne ‘drunk,’ Johnny ‘golddigger,’” Barr said. “Thank God I had control. Because kibosh. When we saw the edited version, we were just appalled. We were just fucking appalled.”

Now Barr has returned to reality television with Roseanne’s Nuts, a Lifetime channel project I hoped she was whole-heartedly endorsing out of something other than wishful thinking or purely profit-driven pragmatism (as if either has ever been Roseanne’s way.) Roseanne’s Nutsis an odd and charming twist on the reality format that follows the titular star around her Hawaiian macadamia nut farm where she battles wild pigs and pontificates on saving the world.  While the relationships between Barr, long-time boyfriend Johnny Argent, and the rest of her family and friends come off as authentically alive and loving, particular events are intentionally, campily stagy.  The show wears its reality-fakery as a badge of comedic honor, a wise choice. It is often funny as hell.Roseanne’s Nutsis more than just a chance for wacky stunts (Roseanne learns to surf, a museum is haunted, Roseanne, Phyllis Diller, and Sandra Bernhard get delightfully smashed on kava drinks), though.  Roseanne’s interest in growing nuts as an environmentally sustainable protein source, in leaving Hollywood to grow her own food and live a healthier life, are genuine and engaging.  Her politics and personality are on full display: if you like her, you will enjoy this show.  A less-expected pleasure is the family dynamic; Roseanne’s extremely believable Conner clan was the center of Roseanne’s success, and here Roseanne’s real-life family is (thank god) no less realistic.  Roseanne’s relationship with Argent, a calm presence who balances her often volatile vibrance, is particularly touching.  They bicker a lot (arguments are often both obviously staged and completely plausible) and clearly adore the hell out of each other.  I was struck by how rarely I see believable, happy adult partnerships on TV.  This one (like Dan and Roseanne Conners’ before) does my heart good.  It’s also moving when Roseanne’s kids drop in, they’re a sharp bunch who seem to have turned out wonderfully despite childhoods inside a Hollywood pressure cooker of scandal.

The Lifetime network’s reality format does have some drawbacks and limitations.  It is frustrating to see some of the more compelling content shoe horned in to this formula.  One of my favorite episodes is the third, in which Roseanne faces her own past demons and works through genuine terror to sing “The Star Spangled Banner” at a local girls’ little league game (for our younger readers: a botched rendition of the same almost derailed Roseanne’s skyrocketing career almost two decades ago, the event has plagued her ever since.)  It’s an episode packed with real pathos and struggle, and its frustrating to hear the exact specifications of these pathos and struggles spelled out over and over again to meet the demands of reality (and maybe most current) television, editing which caters to the distracted.  Those of us actually watching the show don’t need to be reminded every three minutes that this is a very important event for Roseanne, that she is very scared, that the last time she publicly sang the national anthem, it almost ruined everything.  We would (I hope) rather be shown than told, and there are plenty of rich, emotional scenes in the show.  It pains me that guest Bonnie Bramlett  (Barr’s friend and “Bonnie” on Roseanne.  She shows up to help Barr prepare for her performance) is not heard singing.  Her rendition of the National Anthem was apparently slashed to make room for the upteenth repetition by Barr’s son that his mom’s original anthem  butchery was a major calamity of his childhood, so he’s skeptical of attempt to right past wrongs and blah blah blah…got it.  Heard you the first time.  Producers: please either let your editors include interview footage that goes deeper into these themes as they recur, or move the fuck on.

I appreciate how Roseanne has goosed the reality format with her Nuts, but I would love to see her work with a looser formula, or one that enhances rather than restricts the material.  Until that opportunity knocks, it’s great to have her back on TV and I hope Roseanne’s Nuts is renewed for a second season.  It’s been a delightful and invigorating summer treat.

Roseanne’s Nuts airs on Lifetime at 10pm.  Full episodes are also available streaming online (I particularly recommend episode 10: “Weed is Wack”)


About Nicole Witte

I write and make movies.
This entry was posted in Nicole Solomon, Reality TV, Television and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to So about Roseanne’s Nuts…

  1. Julie says:

    I think Roseanne is a genius. Period. Enough said.

  2. gazoo2u says:

    Rosanne has always thumbed her nose at convention and forced expectations. It’s not only that she’s her own woman, it’s that she’s her own person. I love that she says ‘fuck you’ to fashion, glam, and all the trappings and limitations Hollywood eventually forces on most stars of any caliber, particular ‘reality stars’. I’m tired of reading comments from people who say she’d be so ‘pretty’ if she would just do x, y, and z. Fuck that. Rosanne is beautiful in all other ways that are important and vital. And yes, I do think she is physically pretty, and so glad it’s not in that insipid siliconed triple-D, Lady Clairol’d, balloon-lip’d caricature so many women think is essential to success, vitality and happiness.
    The genius of her first sitcom, Rosanne, is that the characters resonated in ways tv had never experienced before. Despite what has been said for years, the show did not portray a ‘dysfunctional’ family. Rosanne portrayed a very functional family—love, laughter and support were the hallmarks of the show and though they fought with each other and were often seemingly disrespectful, the viewer never got the idea that they were not functioning as a family. That was where the genius resided. It seems counter-intuitive on all counts to show all the many facets; the good, the bad and the ugly, of family life, and hope to come out the other side with a fundamentally likeable and relatable family, but that’s exactly what happened.
    Yeah, we all loved Leave It To Beaver, but few of us could relate on any level. We weren’t suppose to, tv was always about fantasy, until Rosanne came along, and made Rosanne (the show) the first real look at family, thus, really, the first reality show.
    Good luck Rosanne. Your touch is needed to keep this world tilted just so…I hope you continue to dazzle us with the brilliance you’ve become known for.

    • nicolewitte says:

      Despite what has been said for years, the show did not portray a ‘dysfunctional’ family.

      Absolutely. A lot of people wish they could have had Dan and Roseanne Conner for parents. They were flawed, they made mistakes, they were human, and they were good parents in a loving and supportive family.

      We’re definitely gonna write more extensively about the ’90s Roseanne show, here. There’s a lot to say.

      Thanks for reading!

  3. Danielle says:

    Thanks for this write-up; I was a big fan of “Roseanne” in the 1990s and am now inspired to go watch “Roseanne’s Nuts”!

  4. Pingback: Some Musical and Other Artistic Highlights from Occupy Wall Street & Beyond |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s